- Aleph
- Anna Gat
- Ariel LeBeau
- Austin Robey
- David Blumenstein
- David Ehrlichman
- David Kerr
- Devon Moore
- Dexter Tortoriello
- Drew Coffman
- Drew Millard
- Eileen Isagon Skyers
- FWB Staff
- Gaby Goldberg
- Greg Bresnitz
- Greta Rainbow
- Ian Rogers
- Jessica Klein
- Jose Fernandez da Ponte
- Jose Mejia
- Kelani Nichole
- Kelsie Nabben
- Kevin Munger
- Khalila Douze
- Kinjal Shah
- Kyla Scanlon
- LUKSO
- Lindsay Howard
- Maelstrom
- Marc Moglen
- Marvin Lin
- Mary Carreon
- Matt Newberg
- Mike Pearl
- Mike Sunda (PUSH)
- Moyosore Briggs
- Nicole Froio
- Ruby Justice Thelot
- Ryne Saxe
- Simon Hudson
- Steph Alinsug
- The Blockchain Socialist
- Willa Köerner
- Yana Sosnovskaya
- Yancey Strickler
- iz
Tue Jul 30 2024
"Man is nothing else but what he makes of himself." – Jean-Paul Sartre, Existentialism is a Humanism, 1946.
In this digital age, our self-creation and the narratives we build around our identities are influenced by the data we generate and how it is interpreted by artificial intelligence systems. This process of self-creation through digital interactions underscores the existential reality that our identities are continuously shaped and reshaped in response to the technologies with which we engage.
As artificial intelligence assumes a more central role in our online interactions, its influence stretches beyond personal identity to the core of digital communities. Previously these communities flourished based on the assumption of direct human engagement. But as artificial intelligence becomes more embedded in these digital environments, the way we recognize and form connections within these communities inevitably shifts. Determining whether we are communicating with a human or an artificial intelligence inevitably shifts the dynamics of our interactions and the level of trust we invest in these exchanges.
In the vast expanse of our digital frontier, where algorithms dictate rhythms and data outlines destinies, the essence of being human finds itself in a state of constant negotiation. As we step further onto the Precipice of Personhood, we confront an evolving landscape where our identities are increasingly intertwined with, and validated by, artificial intelligence. Standing on this precipice, we are at the edge of a significant transformation, poised to redefine our existence through the very technologies we have forged.
Affirming Humanity in the Digital Realm
In an age where our interactions are mediated by screens and our thoughts captured by digital echoes, the fundamental question arises: What does it mean to be human? This inquiry delves deeper than the biological or the sociological; it touches the core of our interactions with artificial intelligence, which now plays a pivotal role in recognizing and affirming our personhood. Aristotle observed that “[m]an is by nature a social animal; an individual who is unsocial naturally and not accidentally is either beneath our notice or more than human." His observation reflects our intrinsic need for authentic or genuine human connections, even in a digital age.
Artificial intelligence has the potential to become the gatekeeper of our digital connections, a judge, plagued by paradox, that both reflects and shapes our understanding of self. Through its massive computational power, artificial intelligence confirms our existence by cataloging our behaviors, preferences, and interactions. In this process, it creates a new form of validation—one where humanity is recognized through the digital footprints we leave behind.
The Complexity of Verification
Verification remains a complex task, involving material proofs like state-mediated documents like passports and licenses, or personal presence. In the digital realm, physical interactions are replaced by data transactions, making authentication a different kind of challenge. When used correctly, artificial intelligence can intervene as a validator, analyzing vast amounts of data to ascertain an individual's authenticity.
Artificial intelligence algorithms process patterns in our digital behavior—our browsing history, social media interactions, purchase habits, and even typing styles. These patterns form a unique digital fingerprint, a complex web of data points that AI uses to validate our identity. This powerful method raises questions about privacy and the potential misuse of personal data. The technology that authenticates us also holds the power to surveil and control, adding complexity to the trust we place in digital systems.
The Dark Side of AI
The paradox of artificial intelligence extends beyond its role as a gatekeeper. Technological advancements that enable artificial intelligence to authenticate identities also empower malicious actors to create deep fakes, scale misinformation, and engage in activities that undermine trust. Deep fakes—highly realistic but fake digital representations of people—can spread false information, manipulate public opinion, and damage reputations. AI-driven bots and algorithms further complicate the landscape by scaling misinformation.
This dark side of artificial intelligence highlights another side of the precipice: while artificial intelligence can validate identity, it can also deceive and manipulate on an unprecedented scale. The challenge is to harness artificial intelligence's power to encourage trust and ensure authenticity while mitigating its potential for harm.
The Role of Blockchain
From our FEST24 manifesto "The Year of Validation," we learn that our need for innovative solutions is urgent. As we explore the integration of artificial intelligence and blockchain, we see how these technologies support each other, creating a symbiotic system that enhances both trust and authenticity. Blockchain provides the secure framework within which artificial intelligence can operate, ensuring that the data artificial intelligence uses and generates remains untampered. This collaboration creates a new standard of validation, where each technology compensates for the potential weaknesses of the other, leading to a more reliable and trustworthy digital ecosystem.
Blockchain technology, when combined with artificial intelligence, offers a robust solution to the paradox of digital authentication. Blockchain, a decentralized and immutable ledger, ensures data cannot be altered once recorded. This transparent and secure framework is ideal for validating identity: artificial intelligence analyzes and validates data, while blockchain ensures its integrity and immutability.
Consider the Orb, a device designed by Tools for Humanity to validate personhood and uniqueness. The Orb takes an image of the iris and turns it into an iris code. The image is subsequently stored as an encrypted bundle on the user’s phone and deleted from the Orb. The iris code is then split into multiple secure shares stored across several encrypted databases. After this verification, a key to which only the user holds the secret is added to a list of verified keys on a blockchain, creating an immutable record of verification. This rigorous, exceptionally private, and tamper-proof approach solves for the formidable complexities of proof of personhood in the age of AI.
The Future of Digital Communities
Immanuel Kant observed, "The human being is a being that is aware of its existence, and for whom its existence is an issue." This awareness and the existential concerns it brings are magnified in the digital age, where our existence is constantly affirmed and questioned by the technologies with which we engage. The goal should be to harness artificial intelligence and blockchain to enhance our understanding of personhood and create systems that validate and protect our identities, not just for individuals but for the integrity of digital communities as well.
Until now, most communities have thrived on the assumption of human-to-human interactions. However, as AI becomes more integrated into these spaces, the dynamics of human identification and community formation are changed. In digital communities, AI can help verify the authenticity of participants, ensuring that interactions are genuinely human. This becomes crucial as the lines between AI-generated content and human-generated content blur. Knowing whether we are interacting with a human or an AI can fundamentally alter the nature of our engagements and the trust we place in these interactions.
Navigating the Paradox
To navigate this precipice, it is essential to balance the benefits of artificial intelligence and blockchain with ethical considerations and robust privacy protections. These technologies offer a path forward in digital authentication but require careful stewardship to ensure individual rights and identities are protected.
The integration of artificial intelligence and blockchain should be guided by principles that prioritize human dignity and community integrity. As Martin Heidegger stated, "Being human is being a question for oneself." By doing so, we can create digital spaces where trust and authenticity are maintained, allowing for genuine human connections even in an AI-enhanced environment.
Embracing the Future
While much has been debated about the methods for confirming and authenticating personhood, as highlighted by Vitalik Buterin (and updated a year later), what is becoming increasingly clear is that time is not on our side. It would have been beneficial to debate this for many generations, but the plausibility seemed too far-fetched until it wasn’t. We now face urgent questions: What happens when trust erodes among humans? What happens when we get used to believing things are fake? How do we change as a society when we can no longer trust what we see and hear?
Like many issues today, this challenge is unprecedented, and we are wholly unprepared for it. The solutions will undoubtedly trigger a wide array of emotions, but before we fall off this cliff, we must ensure that as we evolve, so do our forms of trust. As we move forward along the Precipice of Personhood, let us embrace the possibilities artificial intelligence and blockchain offer while remaining critical of their complexities. By striving for a future where technology enhances our humanity, we can navigate the paradox of digital authentication with confidence and care. In this journey, our true validation lies not just in the digital footprints we leave behind but in our collective commitment to preserving the essence of our humanity and the integrity of our communities.