Aleph

Anna Gat

Ariel LeBeau

Austin Robey

Cooper Turley

David Blumenstein

David Ehrlichman

David Kerr

Devon Moore

Dexter Tortoriello

Drew Coffman

Drew Millard

Eileen Isagon Skyers

FWB Staff

Gaby Goldberg

Greg Bresnitz

Greta Rainbow

Ian Rogers

Jessica Klein

Jose Fernandez da Ponte

Jose Mejia

Kelani Nichole 

Kelsie Nabben

Kevin Munger

Khalila Douze

Kinjal Shah

Kyla Scanlon

LUKSO

Lindsay Howard

Maelstrom

Marc Moglen

Marvin Lin

Mary Carreon

Matt Newberg

Mike Pearl

Mike Sunda (PUSH)

Moyosore Briggs

Nicole Froio

Ruby Justice Thelot

Ryne Saxe

Simon Hudson

Steph Alinsug

The Blockchain Socialist

Willa Köerner

Yana Sosnovskaya

Yancey Strickler

Home

Join

Editorial

About

Events

This essay is adapted from an original lecture by the same name given by Ryne Saxe as FWB FEST24.

Growing up in a small town, I learned early that money is about more than just numbers in a bank account. My father, a local business owner, operated on a principle deeper than simple transactions—his word was his bond, and value flowed through relationships as much as through cash.

I remember from my childhood witnessing value transfer between my family and others, exchanges that may not have happened otherwise without immediate payment being an expectation. We were low in money but high in currency.

Money vs. Currency: More Than Just Semantics

We typically use "money" and "currency" interchangeably, but they're actually fascinating concepts with a rich, complex history. Think of them less as dry financial terms and more as evolving technologies for human connection.

Money is a societal construct. If you think about it long enough, you realize it’s actually a pretty esoteric concept — how we attach value to things, and derive various rights and freedoms from it.

However vague a concept, “money” has formalized over time with the rise of coordinated financial markets. The concept of money has consumed the secular concept of currency. But the concept of currency actually came first. If money is a societal construct, currency was and is a social one. And now I think they’re diverging again along those lines. Currency is sort of “re-liberalizing” if you will, and quickly.

A Brief (and Slightly Unconventional) History of Exchange

The standard story about money's origin goes something like this: Humans got tired of trading chickens for pottery, so we invented money. But the real story is far more interesting.

Emerging research suggests money didn't develop simply to compensate for trade inefficiencies. Instead, it evolved as a sophisticated way of tracking social obligations. Imagine early societies not as simple marketplaces, but as intricate networks of debt and credit. The concept of money came about as production increased and specialized, early civilizations began to trade, and social strata formed. Merchants or towns or early governments wanted to underwrite and increase production so they basically invented rudimentary credit systems. When they started to track debts and credits in writing, people started to exchange credits instead of settling debts in real goods.

A farmer might owe a carpenter a favor, which could be "paid" through various means—not just with coins, but with reputation, future assistance, or community standing.

The US Dollar's global dominance, for instance, isn't just about trade. It's a complex system of credit, trust, and collective agreement about value.

Long before formal economic systems, "currency" was something entirely different. Value was measured by:

Sound familiar? It's essentially a pre-digital version of social capital.

Here's a mind-bending thought: Money is a collective story we've all agreed to believe in. It's a human-created technology for coordinating behavior, not some immutable law of nature.

The "money myth" is fragile. Currency derives its power not from inherent worth, but from collective belief.

When that belief shifts, entire economic realities can transform.

The Next Wave: Beyond Traditional Currency

We're witnessing the early stages of a fundamental reimagining of how we exchange value. The current financial system isn't a stable monument—it's more like a legacy software desperately needing an update.

Cryptocurrency represents something far more profound than just a new payment method. It's a philosophical experiment in reimagining value exchange.

Imagine economic coordination not as a top-down system, but as a dynamic network of micro-exchanges. Communities forming around shared purpose, transcending geographical boundaries, creating value in ways we're only beginning to understand.

Cryptocurrency's deepest potential isn't technological—it's human. It offers a way to return to a more nuanced understanding of value: that "money" is whatever enough people collectively decide it can be.

Our challenge is to shape this transformation. Not toward chaos, but toward a more flexible, inclusive way of understanding how we create and exchange value.

Currency has always been about connection—about how we recognize and reward contribution. As we move forward, we're not just changing how we pay for things. We're reimagining how we value each other.

The future of money is a conversation we're all part of. And we're just getting started.

The money myth and the real promise of crypto.

Currency in a Post-Money World

Every now and then, we hit a shift in technology that changes everything. The internet did it, open-source software did it, and now blockchains are doing it. At first glance, people ask the same question they always do: 

“Why do we need this when the old system still works?”

 But if you dig deeper, it becomes clear that the old systems have cracks—they’ve been optimized for the past, not for the future we’re building.

Blockchains offer a fundamentally new way to build systems that are more open, more inclusive, and more efficient. At their core, they lower 

—the hidden frictions that slow down innovation and lock out new participants. These costs are embedded in everything we do today, from making payments to creating content to running social networks. But the good news is, blockchains can help eliminate many of them. And when you reduce transaction costs, innovation unlocks: new markets emerge, people are empowered to build, and systems become more democratic.

In this piece, I’m going to talk about why decentralization matters in a very practical sense, as a means not an end; how blockchains are the next logical step in the evolution of the internet; and what that means for the future of how we create, share, and transact.

Why Centralization Works—Until It Doesn’t

First, let’s talk about why centralized systems exist in the first place. It comes down to 

—the costs of finding information, negotiating deals, and enforcing agreements. Large organizations, like corporations or banks, emerge because they lower these costs. They handle all the complexity and friction at scale.

But centralization has its limits. While it reduces some costs, it can create new problems. If unchecked, it can lock in power and it can lead to excessive concentration. And if a small number of players control everything, innovation slows down. The same companies that were once disruptors can become incumbents focused on protecting their turf.

Decentralization flips that script, when a system can run at lower transaction costs without concentrating power. When systems are open and permissionless, anyone can build on top of them, just like developers did with the early internet. That’s where blockchains come in—they enable a new wave of innovation by removing the need for central gatekeepers and allowing people to interact directly, securely, and at scale at a fraction of the cost.

Blockchains as a New Platform for Builders

So why are blockchains different? Blockchains don’t just replicate old systems—they offer a fundamentally new way to build. At the heart of this is the idea of 

 In traditional systems, you need intermediaries to establish trust. When you pay someone, a bank verifies the transaction. When you sign a contract, a lawyer enforces it. Blockchains cut out the middleman by using decentralized networks where consensus is achieved automatically. This reduces the cost of doing business and makes the system more open.

, which are self-executing programs that remove the need for third parties. Once certain conditions are met, the contract automatically enforces itself. This cuts down on legal costs, negotiation time, and complexity, allowing smaller, more frequent interactions to still be economical.

 Blockchains give users control over their own data and assets. Everything is transparent and verifiable on the blockchain, meaning users no longer need to trust centralized platforms to handle their data. This shifts power back to individuals, creating a more user-owned network.

What This Means for the Future of Innovation

When transaction costs drop, we see a push to decentralization and an explosion of innovation. This has already started to happen across industries.

 The traditional payment system is built on 50 years old infrastructure. It’s slow and expensive, and still has barriers to access. Blockchains offer a solution that’s faster, cheaper, and more inclusive. Stablecoins and decentralized payment networks can move money across borders in seconds for pennies. This isn’t just an incremental improvement—it’s a complete redesign of how money moves. Imagine a world where payments settle instantly, 24/7, with minimal fees. That world is being built right now.

Today’s social networks keep users inside walled gardens. With blockchain-based platforms like 

, users can own their data and move freely between networks. This shifts power from platforms back to users and unlocks entirely new business models where creators can capture more value.

 are transforming telecom by letting anyone with a wireless hotspot participate in a decentralized network and get paid for it. This democratizes access and reduces the costs of building large-scale networks.

 are building the future of content creation by allowing creators to publish and monetize their work without relying on centralized platforms. This gives creators more control and ownership, while reducing the fees and middlemen that typically take a cut of their earnings. The result? A more creator-friendly internet.

The most exciting part about decentralization is its practical outcome: it gives power back to the people who are building and creating. From a system based on platforms, creators and builders can now own their work, set their own terms, and capture more of the value they create.

This is about more than just technology. It’s about shifting the power dynamics of the internet. Web3 is giving us a chance to redesign the rules, so the future is open, permissionless, and built by the community.

Decentralization isn’t just about cost savings—it’s about inclusion. Today’s centralized systems don’t serve everyone equally. There are people who don’t have access to banking services or live in areas without reliable infrastructure. Blockchains can help close that gap.

Take payments again as an example. We’re seeing blockchain-based solutions being used in crisis zones, where traditional infrastructure fails. The United Nations has used stablecoins on the Stellar blockchain to send aid directly to refugees. We see people send money to their loved ones back home straight from their Venmo wallets to stablecoin-enabled wallets at substantially better cost making their funds go further. We have talked to SMBs that are increasingly using stablecoins for B2B payments across borders. And we are starting to see many cases that abstract complexity from users, building a familiar fiat money experience on top of blockchain settlement infrastructure as the path for mainstream adoption.

The Path Forward: Why We Need to Keep Building

We’re still early. Blockchains and decentralized technologies are in their infancy, but the trajectory is clear. The more we lower transaction costs, the more opportunities we create for builders and creators to innovate. Just like the early days of the internet, the potential here is enormous.

But the challenge, as always, is to keep building and build responsibly. The more open we make these systems, the more inclusive and dynamic the internet becomes. And this isn’t about technology for the sake of technology—it’s about creating a future where anyone, anywhere, can participate, build, and create while balancing efficiency with smart governance and regulation.

The future of decentralization is more than just a technological shift—it’s a chance to reshape how we interact, do business, and build a more inclusive world. By reducing transaction costs, blockchains unlock new possibilities, enabling people and businesses to participate in a system that is fairer, faster, and more open.

This is about creating a future where systems aren’t just efficient—they’re accessible, inclusive, and built for everyone. And we’re just getting started.

is a 4-part editorial series investigating the path toward a blockchain-dominant future, where financial tools are intertwined with cultural narratives.

With essays by a storied cast of eminent culture and finance experts including

Blockchains are the next logical step in the evolution of the internet.

The Economics of Decentralization: How Blockchains are Building the Future

David Blumenstein is a senior service designer in Melbourne, Australia. He's also an award winning cartoonist and graphic reporter for outlets like 

, Australia’s first open comics studio. He's currently deputy president of the Australian Cartoonists Association. Find his work at

Read “Octane Render,” a non-fiction comic by David Blumenstein. 

Fri Mar 24 2023

Other Editorial: